Category Archives: USA

Well Well Well…Tea baggers take note

..and this is the thanks they get on your tea bag websites...

Before you read this article please note WHO proposed the amendments and what how the vote turned out to pass these amendments…I think a lot of people in this country need to look behind the curtain.

Senate Ends Taxpayer-Funded Bank Bailouts

by: Patricia Murphy

The Senate made two significant changes to the Wall Street reform bill Wednesday, including a ban on using taxpayer money to salvage failing financial institutions.

The amendments followed a breakthrough in negotiations between Democratic and Republican leaders.

The first amendment came from Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who proposed banning federal funds from being used to bail out large financial institutions. Boxer called her amendment “an ironclad assurance that if a failing Wall Street firm is liquidated, the cost of that liquidation must come either from selling off the firm’s assets or from assessments of big Wall Street firms.” The Senate passed it 96 to 1, with Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) objecting.

Next up was a joint amendment from Sens. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) prescribing an orderly disposal of firms deemed “too big to fail.” Their measure would give the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) the power to seize and liquidate large financial firms if their failure would pose a risk to the U.S. economy.

The last-minute compromise hammered out between Dodd and Shelby came after Republicans refused for days to go along with Dodd’s original idea. He proposed creating a $50 billion bailout fund, paid for by banks, to use in case liquidation of large firms becomes necessary. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called the proposal a “permanent bailout fund,” while Maine Republican Susan Collins warned that institutions engaged in risky behavior would have a government safety net.

The Senate passed the Shelby-Dodd measure, 93 to 5.

The near-unanimous votes came after weeks of partisan bickering by senators in both parties, with each side accusing the other of working to help Wall Street at the expense of small businesses and taxpayers.

Republicans argued that under the Dodd plan, any business that extends credit to its customers could be subject to the measure’s regulations. On Tuesday, McConnell warned it would give the federal government regulatory authority over businesses that are not financial institutions. “It has an extraordinarily broad reach at the moment, that could go right down to an orthodontist in middle America providing credit for a family having their child’s teeth straightened,” McConnell said.

But Democrats maintained that it would apply only to firms that make extending credit a core business.

At a press conference Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid alleged that any Republican objection to the overall reform bill is meant to protect Wall Street.

“Republicans are having difficulty determining how they’re going to continue making love to Wall Street,” Reid said. “It’s obvious they don’t want to put any decent restrictions on what Wall Street has done or is doing.”

With two roll call votes down, and more than 90 amendments still pending, Dodd predicted Wednesday that debate on financial reform will last at least through the end of next week.

Original Posting

Some light reading for Monday

“Religion” is a personal and largely subjective topic for any debate, even for rational people.  The raw emotion that comes out is sometimes painful to experience first hand and very difficult watch when it comes from another person whose deep rooted emotions and beliefs are pressed and questioned-even in a non-judgmental manner.

We all have seen friendships tarnished as the result of some religious line of questioning.  So, as you might  imagine, I refrain from religious debates, discussions, or religious meetings with people I know as a general rule.  I think it is better to leave religion to the faithful and, as long as their religion does not interfere with my family or me, live and let live.

That being said, I completely believe  that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs-EVEN if I completely disagree or can’t possible understand that belief.  I also think that it is your responsibility to validate your OWN opinion regarding your chosen religion by looking at the history, foundations, and tenants of your chosen religion and evaluating those criteria versus your emotional attachment to that religion.

As I typed that last sentence, I realized that if every single person of every religion actually did that, the religions would change almost overnight.  If every person really sat down and looked at what their church, denomination, synagogue, strip mall Christian life center, mega church really stood for, donated money to, campaigned for, socially supported, and politically backed I think many sets of eyes would be opened.

Growing up I was reared in a southern baptist church.  It was small and traditionally styled.  I remember my family in uncomfortable pews, old gospel hymns, mini-saltine crackers, and grape juice in shot glasses for communion on special occasions.  Those things make me smile when I remember them.  However, There was something else there every Sunday morning.  A reminder that if I did not walk the walk and talk the talk like a good Christian should – I was going to Hell.  It was made clear to me that this was not a debatable issue.  In my young sponge like brain I KNEW that the man quasi-yelling at me in a fervent tone truly believed that I was a damned soul- If I didn’t change my 5 year old ways.

I admit that back then I was too young to understand his point or motivation for scaring people or what was really going on but, I did know some very definite, real things in those early days.  Some were:

1) I had the chance to go to Hell or Heaven and God will judge me when I die.

2) If I, a 5 year old, didn’t change my ways, Hell awaited.

3) This man is scaring me.

4) What this man is saying  MUST be true because my grandmother, grandfather, parents, aunts, cousins and 50 other people are nodding their heads in agreement with everything this man says.

From early on, I was being shown, by those that feed me and care for me, that what was going on in this church is “right” and “the way it is” because the loud scary man is telling the truth.  As I have aged, I believe exposure to different things is vital to become truly intelligent and forming your OWN opinions.  Sadly, the opposite is also true and an easier row to hoe.  To avoid things because you don’t know anything about them, demonizing opposite schools of thought, or simply  doing what you are told and following along limits your ability to grow as a person.  I truly believe that.  I once heard an intelligent, college educated man say, “I am a Republican because my dad was a Republican.”  (NO POLITICAL COMMENT HERE)  I think the same thinking goes for religion.  Not researching YOUR own beliefs and weighing them against how you feel about the world around you is denying your ability to reason and preventing self determination and that, in my humble opinion, is a waste of a life.

I am not advocating going out and attempting to disprove every religion in the world.  I am not saying that there is no truth in organized religion.  I am not saying that there aren’t good people doing good work in the name of religions around the world.  I am not claiming that religions are corrupt or misleading people.

I am saying that you, as an intelligent person, need to be open to all information and facts and constantly reevaluate your positions and beliefs on EVERYTHING, even religion.  If you do not open yourself up to new information and different points of view you will become sedate and stagnant in your intellectual development in regard to whatever issue you choose to put your head in the sand about.

If you are a Christian, know why YOU are a Christian.  If you are a Buddhist, know why YOU are a Buddhist.  If you are Jewish, know why YOU are Jewish.  If you are an atheist, know WHY you are an atheist.  YOU are all that matters in the arena of your life.  It is your responsibility to learn from those around you, take information from everywhere, research the writings of people you agree with and disagree with, but in the end decide for yourself what you believe and believe in.

It is truly the most important decision YOU can make for yourself.

Obtuse View Store Now Open!

Now you can show your support for Obtuse View.

Wanna be famous?

Wanna be seen by thousands of people?

Here’s how:

1) Navigate  to Obtuse View Swag Shop

2) Purchase the item(s) of your choice

3) Take a photo of yourself using /wearing your kickin’ item (be creative!)

4) Email it to obtuse.view@yahoo.com and I will post it on the site

5) Contact an entertainment lawyer/agent to handle your upcoming appearances

It’s that easy…do it.

Fame Awaits.

Unreal…flippin unreal

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/04/27/republicans-filibuster-our-economic-future/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=alternet

If I were able to write more I would. I’m mobile and now upset. If this dosen’t convince you that the Republican party DOES NOT have your best interest at heart as a middle class citizen. Then you get what this crappy Congressional divide yields. People are dumb. Read and learn.

Some Assigned Reading

Article in Chicago Sun Times covering Tax Day Tea Party In Daley Center. Enjoy.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

‘Chicago Tax Day Tea Party,” read the colorful card handed to me as I emerged from Union Station into the soft, summery day Thursday.

“Liberty” it continued, in spidery, colonial-era script. “Constitutional Principles. Fiscal Responsibility.” Then, in bright-red type — the blood of patriots, no doubt — “Repeal it! Replace Congress.” And finally: “Chicago. Daley Plaza. 12:00 Noon.”

Oh, right, I thought, sadly realizing that, though I’d love to toddle off to Gene & Georgetti as planned, I was duty-bound to cancel lunch — another sacrifice on the altar of freedom! — so as not to miss this moment in history. I’m sure guys were sheepishly telling their grandchildren, “No, Johnny, I was not at Lexington & Concord. But I was quite near — the Spooner Tavern, two miles down the road, sharing a potato pie with Jim Griswald . . . ” Read the rest of this entry

News Flash: Republican’s hate the Poor (and minorities)

What a novel thought...

Below is an article written by Sam Stein, a political blogger.  You can read the original posting here.  I am not going to expound on what this article expresses until you read it for yourself.  I will let you draw your own conclusions and my comments will follow.  However, I will highlight my favorite parts of it, so you can easily predict what is currently pissing me off. (HINT: RED = BAD )

Read the rest of this entry

Wiretapping Misconceptions: Compliments of Fak3r

My friend Fak3r (as seen here) has “been online for over 15 years, blogging for 10.”  He also  works with “open source software, various hardware and whatever else that I can hack on.”  In his spare time he enjoys “learning by doing, painting infrequently and listening to more music than the law allows.”  Kids, today he as also provided us with some knowledge:  Prepare for it to drop on ya dome. Read the rest of this entry

If you aren’t guilty then why do this???

By NICOLE WINFIELD, Associated Press Writer Nicole Winfield, Associated Press Writer 23 mins ago

VATICAN CITY – Dragged deeper than ever before into the clerical sex abuse scandal, the Vatican is launching a legal defense that the church hopes will shield the pope from a lawsuit in Kentucky seeking to have him deposed.

In court documents obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press, Vatican lawyers map out a three-pronged strategy — to be formally filed in coming weeks — seeking to dismiss the suit before Benedict XVI can be questioned or secret documents subpoenaed.

Vatican lawyers plan to argue that the pope has immunity as head of state, that American bishops who oversaw abusive priests weren’t employees of the Vatican, and that a 1962 document is not the “smoking gun” that provides proof of a cover up, the documents reveal.

Three men claiming they were abused by priests brought the suit against the Holy See in 2004, accusing Rome of negligence in failing to alert police or the public about priests who molested children in Kentucky.

The preview of the legal defense, provided to the AP by a person familiar with the case, was submitted last month in the U.S. District Court in Louisville. Vatican officials declined to comment.

The case is significant because it’s the first among a handful of cases targeting Rome in the United States to reach the stage of determining whether the victims actually have a claim against the Vatican itself.

Previous cases attempting to implicate the Vatican have failed or are pending at more preliminary stages.

In the Kentucky suit, the men argued that U.S. diocesan bishops were employees of the Holy See, and that Rome was therefore responsible for their alleged wrongdoing in failing to report abuse.

They charged that a 1962 Vatican document mandated that bishops not report sex abuse cases to police. The Vatican has argued that there is nothing in the document that precluded bishops from reporting pedophiles to police.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

If you want a barometer on the idiocy of Americans…LOOK AT THIS!

Harris Interactive, a market research firm, conducted a study about what people thought about Pres. Obama. These are the results that come from the Harris Poll that involved 2,320 adults who were surveyed online between March 1 and March 8.

Here’s the percentage breakdown of respondents’ views of President Obama:

  • 40 percent think he is a Socialist 
  • 38 percent say he wants to take away Americans’ right to own guns.
  • 32 percent say he is a Muslim.
  • 29 percent think he wants to turn over the sovereignty of the United States to a one world government.
  • 29 percent think he has done many things that are unconstitutional.
  • 27 percent say he resents America’s heritage.
  • 27 percent say he does what Wall Street and the bankers tell him to do.
  • 25 percent say he was not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president.
  • 25 percent say he is a domestic enemy that the U.S. Constitutions speaks of.
  • 23 percent say he is a racist.
  • 23 percent say he is anti-American.
  • 23 percent say he wants to use an economic collapse or terrorist attack as an excuse to take dictatorial powers.
  • 20 percent say he is doing many of the things that Hitler did.
  • 14 percent think Obama is the anti-Christ

The findings lend support to a theme touted in John Avlon’s new book “Wingnuts: How the Lunatic Fringe Is Hijacking America.”

“This poll should be a wake-up call to all Americans about the real costs of using fear and hate to pump up hyper-partisanship,” Avlon said after reviewing the findings. “We are playing with dynamite by demonizing our president and dividing our country in the process. Americans need to remember the perspective that Wingnuts always forget – patriotism is more important than partisanship.”

**Interesting side note: According to this poll 7 in 10 Americans in that study admitted they know very little about the Islamic religion.

This is another example that Americans have hard and fast beliefs about shit they know nothing about even when it undermines their own country.  Unreal, completely unreal.

Are you still proud, Mr. Greenwood?